Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

My Federal Disability

Helping Federal & Postal employees to get OPM Disability Retirement Benefits under FERS

My Federal Disability

Main menu

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Credentials
  • Copyright
  • Contact Us

Category Archives: Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM

Post navigation

← Older posts

CSRS & FERS Disability Retirement: SF 3112C

Posted on January 11, 2010 by Federal Disability Lawyer
1

Standard Form 3112C, the Physician’s Statement, is often an ineffective way of getting one’s treating doctor to prepare and write an effective medical report for a disability retirement application, to be submitted and reviewed by the Office of Personnel Management.  Because it is a standard form — with standard language and guidelines provided in generic form –doctor’s generally dislike taking such “instructional forms” and trying to decipher what is needed, how to properly and effectively interpret the generic instructions, and be the most effective medical advocate on behalf of a patient. 

This is where an attorney’s guidance can be most effective and invaluable; for, ultimately, OPM’s review of eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS is not merely medical, but legal.  Because there are legal standards to be met, eligibility is ultimately determined not solely upon a medical basis, but upon a mixture of medical documentation which must satisfy a legal standard.  That is why the guidance of an attorney is crucial in a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS & CSRS.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, SF 3112C Physician's Statement for CSRS and FERS | Tagged 3112c, 3112c is not only about doctor's statements but also a medical consent form, a medical release form in disguise: 3112c, alternative to using 3112c in federal disability application, an ineffective way to handle your federal disability application, applying for federal disability, attorney's guidance for securing disability benefits for federal workers, civil service disability, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, eligibility to medical benefits federal employee, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, federal employee's physician's statement of disability, federal government disability retirement, federal law enforcement disability retirement, federal medical retirement, fers disability and release of all your medical reports, FERS disability lawyer, filing for OPM disability retirement, first time free case consultation for federal employee disability retirement, forms used for federal workers disability retirement, help in collecting medical evidence and putting package together, helping injured federal workers, legal representation for injured federal workers, legal standards to be met in an opm disability application, mailing medical reports disability claim, medical reports to use in an opm disability claim, nationwide representation of federal employees, not only a "physician's statements" form but also a medical release form, OPM disability application tips, OPM disability application tips and strategies, OPM disability retirement, OPM Disability Retirement, opm disability retirement is not only a medical claim but a legal as well, opm disability retirement should be seen as both a medical and a legal claim, opm's reviews for federal disability elegibility, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", physician's statements in an OPM disability case, postal service disability retirement, postal service opm, regulatory requirements of a fers disability medical report, rehabs in postal service, representing federal employees in and outside the country, sf 3112c and hipaa compliance issues, sf 3112c as a non hipaa compliant, SF 3112C Physician's Statement, SF-3112C, tips for federal workers filing for disability, updated medical report for your opm disability claim, using a medical narrative in lieu of sf 3112c, USPS disability retirement, usps form 3112c, Why not to submit an SF 3112C, why not to use medical authorization on sf-3112c, why not to use standard form 3112c, why you should not release all your medical information to opm | 1 Reply

Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) & Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)

Posted on December 16, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
2

I have received numerous telephone calls which indicate that there are many people who are confused, misinformed, or ill-informed about the issue of Social Security disability, filing for it, when to file for it, etc., in conjunction with filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS (obviously, if you are under CSRS, you do not need to file for it).  For informational purposes, here is the bottom line:  Whether or not you plan to actually qualify for Social Security disability benefits, the only concern with respect to meeting the requirement for the Office of Personnel Management, as part of the FERS disability retirement application, is as follows:  OPM really doesn’t care when you file, so long as you have filed and show a receipt on or before the day they approve your disability retirement application.

Thus, many people will tell me that they were “informed” by their Human Resources personnel that they must file with Social Security first before they can file for OPM disability retirement under FERS (not true); or, that they must have a decision by Social Security before they can file under FERS (even more untrue); or, that OPM will not even look at a federal disability retirement application unless you have first filed with Social Security (again, untrue).  The bottom line:  Yes, you must file for Social Security, but OPM doesn’t need to see a receipt showing that you filed, until the day they approve your OPM disability retirement application.  So, sometime before the Federal Disability Retirement application gets to OPM, or, in those cases where one has procrastinated for too long, even after the application gets to OPM, you need to file for Social Security disability benefits, and have a receipt ready to show OPM.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, Clarifications of Laws or Rules, FERS Disability, OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits | Tagged any ssa disability retirement requirement for the csrs disability application?, are you a fed employee with questions about workers disability compensation?, civil service disability, do I have to "qualify" for social security before getting any opm disability benefits?, even if you are not fully disable on the job federal, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, federal employee disability, federal government employee medical retirement, federal medical retirement benefits, federal worker retirement eligible, fers disability and social security disability insurance ssdi, FERS disability lawyer, FERS Disability Retirement Attorney, FERS Disability Retirement Lawyer, fers retirement social security, if I apply for csrs disability retirement do I also need to file for social security?, if there is any ssi or ssd insurance requirement in opm disabiliy law, is it a "qualification" or just an "application" requirement for ssa disability?, is there a requirement to apply for social security disability in csrs disability?, is there any rules under fers that also apply for ssdi?, more questions about the fers and ssd disability process, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability and social security disability, OPM disability attorney, OPM disability lawyer, OPM Disability Retirement, OPM lawyer, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", postal and social security disability, Postal disability retirement, postal employee retirement assistants, postal service disability retirement, questions about the about the fers and social security disability ssi process, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, should I apply for social security disability before even applying for opm disability?, shouldn't I just have to "apply" for ssd insurance in order to get postal disability benefits?, shouldn't the ssa reach a decision first about my ssd before I file for opm disability?, social security disability award and fers, social security disability compensation for opm disability retirees, social security filing requirement for fers not for csrs, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits | 2 Replies

OPM Disability Retirement: Reconsideration Decisions

Posted on October 14, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
14

Types of reconsideration decisions denying an applicant his or her Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS can and do span the entire spectrum, depending upon the OPM representative who writes up the decision:  from half a page (barely giving a passing, respectful review to a packet which took multiple hours to put together) to over 3 pages long (in the “Discussion Section”); from merely listing general principles of law and generalized, template-like denials to apparent detailed (but very selective) references to various medical reports submitted by the applicant as part of the disability retirement packet — they all boil down to the same thing:  a denial at the initial application stage.

Often, an initial reaction to the denial encompasses a myriad of responses, ranging from incredulity, to resignation, to anger, to indignation.  Set aside the emotionalism.  Further, there is often the reaction to that “one piece” of medical information which the applicant believes should have turned that “denial” into an “approval” — that “one piece” of medical note, statement, sentence, or paragraph which the OPM representative conveniently disregarded or chose not to reference.  Don’t ruminate over it.  It may well be that it was deliberately disregarded; it may even have been overlooked.  More than likely, the OPM representative was fully aware of it, but decided to selectively choose his or her basis as the more “important” and “substantive” evidence, forming the core rationale of the denial.  Don’t waste time.  More work is needed — both medical as well as legal.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

 

Posted in 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage, Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, The OPM Representatives, When The OPM Application Is Denied | Tagged a rational response to an unreasonable letter of denial opm benefits, An employee appealing OPM's denial, attorney to help a usps employee get opm disability, before you write your reconsideration argument to the opm, bring up csrs federal disability retirement, controlling anger and disappointment after opm disability denial, deficiencies of an OPM disability denial, disability retirement benefits under fers, discussion section in the opm denial letter, examining the basis for the denial, federal employee disability benefits, federal employee medical retirement, federal employee's indignation after denial of medical disability, federal medical retirement FERS disability, federal workers winning disability benefits even after first denial, FERS Disability Retirement Attorney, fers disability retirement law firm, FERS Disability Retirement Lawyer, Filing the Request for Reconsideration after first OPM denial, help for rural carriers seeking disability retirement, illogical reasons used by the opm to deny fers disability retirement, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement applic, misstatements as basis for denial, nationwide representation of federal employees, non industrial disability for federal employees, opm decision denying disability benefits, opm denial letter templates and the essence of the denial, opm disability cases, OPM Disability Retirement, opm disability retirement representation in utah, OPM Disability Specialist, OPM Reconsideration Stage, OPM Representative, OPM's methodology, postal disability for supervisors, Postal Service disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, reversing the course of an opm disability denial, setting aside emotionalism after the opm denial of disability benefits, the dreaded denial letter, the federal disability denial letter and the federal employee's reactions, the first opm denial of federal employee medical retirement, the medical condition in fers disability retirement, the opm representative's first-level decision-making process, types of opm disability denial letters, USPS disability retirement, usps medical retirement, washington dc fers disability retirement, when the opm denial for disability letter is just another opm template, when the opm misuses the medical information you submitted, working around an OPM application for disability denial | 14 Replies

OPM Disability Retirement: Always Verify Submissions

Posted on September 25, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

The old saying:  Measure twice, cut once, can be adapted here:  Verify twice, submit once.  I am always surprised by Federal and Postal employees who have filed for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS to hear that a document, a submission, a Request for Reconsideration, an appeal, etc., was sent to the Office of Personnel Management by regular mail, with no manner of verification.

While I have great respect for the personnel who work at the U.S. Postal Service as well as the Office of Personnel Management, such issues have nothing to do with individual competence; instead, it has to do with the recognition that all oversized agencies (do we even have to argue as to what is defined as an “oversized agency”?) have their internal mail problems — not only of sending or receiving mail, but getting it to the right person, etc.

Not everyone needs to be overly “verification-sensitive” like I am, but my methodology for every document forwarded to OPM is as follows:  faxed (with a print-out of a receipt showing that the fax went through), as well as an express mail or FedEx tracking number.  Verify twice, submit once.  The Office of Personnel Management has never won an argument with me that they “never received it.”

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM | Tagged advice on the opm disability retirement paperwork and process, agency losing employee's federal disability application, being careful with the medical documentation you submit to opm, common sense tips on the disability application and documentation, document verification during the fers disability application process, federal disability retirement lawyer new york ny, fers disability and form filling application, filing and preparing for a long-term federal disability process, following up your disability application with the opm, getting proof you mailed opm disability forms and documents, keeping track of all disability retirement paperwork submitted to opm, keeping yourself on top of your fers disability application, limitations to overcome in the opm disability forms, making sure your federal disability documentation is received, medical documentation guidelines, medical retirement from federal service, national representation for opm disability retirement, OPM disability application tips, OPM disability application tips and strategies, opm disability forms, OPM Disability Retirement, opm disability tips for non lawyers, opm medical documents, opm representation in illinois, opm supportive medical documentation, planning an opm disability strategy that goes beyond form filling, post disability application issues, postal service disability retirement, postal workers owcp rights attorney, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, SF 3112 disability retirement forms, taking charge during your fers application for disability benefits, texas opm disability retirement, the unrepresented opm disability applicant, tips for federal workers filing for disability, tips for unrepresented opm disability applicants, tips on how to handle the opm disability application, USPS disability retirement, verifying documents submitted to the office of personnel management, washington state federal opm disability retirement, when human resources loses your opm disability paperwork, when the opm argues that they "never received" your documentation, when the opm follows up your disability retirement claim, when the opm losses your opm application, when the opm request additional medical documentation | Leave a reply

FERS Disability Retirement: Creativity & Objectivity

Posted on August 11, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

The Applicant’s Statement of Disability is a very personal statement; that is precisely why when I take on cases at the Second (Reconsideration) Stage, or at the Merit Systems Protection Board stage, I have an opportunity to read heart-felt, personal, and very “emotional” statements written by the individual applicant. This is not to be negatively critical of such statements — such personal, emotionally-charged statements can be very effective.

On the other hand, it is precisely because the Applicant who writes such a statement — about his or her own personal engagement and experience of the disability — that he or she is unable to provide an objective perspective.  It is very difficult to “stand outside” of one’s self and write about one’s self.  Again, this is not a negative criticism — it is simply what it is.

As an aside, I have had many of my clients who read my interpretive statement of disability, which I craft based upon multiple sources (i.e., by speaking to the client; by having my client fill out a short questionnaire; by reading the medical reports and records, etc.), who tell me later that, yes, the statement of disability accurately reflected their state of medical disability, and further, that it made him or her realize for the first time how “bad off” they were.

It takes a perspective of objectivity to creatively — and accurately — depict one’s own medical disability and the impact of such disability upon one’s life.  For this, a third party — often an attorney — is needed.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

 

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, OPM Disability Application and/or Process | Tagged affirmative approach for OPM disability retirement, applicant's statement of disability, applicant's statements on 2nd and 3rd stage opm disability, applicant’s report on disability retirement fers, applying for disability in the postal service, claim for disabling condition non-work related compensation, claimant's statement for federal disability compensation, disability retirement for federal employees, evaluation of psychological conditions by fers disability applicant, federal employee disability retirement, federal employees long-term compensation non job related, federal employees' compensation disability claim, federal employment accident or injury report, federal job related injury or illness, federal non-work related injury or occupational disease, federal soup postal, federal workers who sustain off-the-clock illnesses, fers claim for compensation occupational disease, fers disability retirement in Missouri, future of limited duty us postal employees, how to write a persuasive statement on disability, injury compensation and light limited duty, limited jobs for light duty employees, long lwop for nervous or mental conditions, losing your federal job because of non-work related injury, mail carrier injury on the job, medical compensation for federal and postal workers, medical resources for us federal employees, medical retirement from federal service, Minnesota employee federal opm disability retirement, MSPB Third Stage, nexus between medical condition and essential elements, notice of traumatic injury claim for compensation, on-the-job accident or injury federal employment, OPM disability, OPM Disability Retirement, opm disability retirement blog, opm disability retirement for a employee in Wisconsin, opm disability statements made by applicant, OPM Initial Stage, OPM medical retirement, OPM Reconsideration Stage, owcp and unable to return to work, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp medical retirement, Postal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, schizophrenia and federal disability retirement, Second Step OPM Appeal, separation while in federal workers comp, severe injury compensation for federal law enforcement agents, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, story of human tragedy, the applicant's medical narrative report, the human side of a disability story, the patient's own account on opm disability retirement, us postal service disability retirement, usps denial federal compensation attorney, usps disability benefits, USPS disability retirement, usps federal compensation attorney, usps separation, what a federal employee can do when injured outside work? | Leave a reply

OPM Disability Retirement: Creativity Is Important in the Applicant’s Statement

Posted on August 10, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

It is important to creatively inter-weave facts, feelings, medical impact, symptoms and conditions into a persuasive Applicant’s Statement of Disability.  It should not be overly emotional; it should not be voluminously long; it should not be preachy; it should not be written as a doctor would write it.  It is the Applicant’s Statement of Disability, and it should be from the Applicant’s perspective; but as with every writing, the “audience” to whom anything is written, must always be kept in mind.

Remember that the audience is a reviewing Office of Personnel Management representative — one who is evaluating, analyzing, and making a decision upon the application for disability retirement.  Of course the independent attachment of medical documentation will be persuasive; of course a review of the position description will have an impact; and of course the analysis of comparing the medical condition with the type of job one has will be scrutinized and will be relevant.

It is the applicant’s statement of disability, however, which will most often be the determining factor.  That is why such a statement must creatively weave all of the various aspects of a disability retirement application — facts, emotions, job impact, medical impact, doctor’s statement, personal statement, impact statement — all in a bundle, all inter-weaving, all in a persuasive, creative description.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, OPM Disability Application and/or Process | Tagged applicant's claim for compensation for non occupational disease, applicant's statement of disability, applying for disability in the postal service, claim for disabling condition non-work related compensation, claimant's statement for federal disability compensation, dfec disability retirement, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement opm, duty status report, evaluation of psychological conditions by fers disability applicant, federal disability law, federal employee applicant's work capacity evaluation, federal employee disability benefits, federal employee medical retirement, federal employees disability retirement, federal employees disability retirement system, federal employees' compensation disability claim, federal non-work related injury or occupational disease, federal opm disability retirement for Tennessee residents, federal workers compensation disability, fers claim for compensation occupational disease, FERS Disability Retirement Lawyer, fers disability retirement opm, georgia opm postal disability retirement, going back to basics, injury or occupational disease claim of law enforcement officer (leo), keeping emotionalism to a minimum, law enforcement officer's claim for compensation statements, legal processes impacts on the opm disability claim, long term disability opm, medical requirements for fers disability, medical retirement for nasa employees, nexus between medical condition and essential elements, notice of traumatic injury claim for compensation, NPS Disability Retirement, ohio employee opm disability retirement, OPM clerks, OPM Disability Retirement, opm disability retirement in district of columbia, opm disability retirement new jersey employees, opm disability statements made by applicant, OPM Representative, persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor, postal employee network, postal service disability retirement, postal service work injury attorney, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS, SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, story of human tragedy, strong and irrefutable medical evidence, support to a physician's medical narrative, the applicant's medical narrative report, the human side of a disability story, traumatic injury federal notice compensation, tva disability retirement, us government employee's evaluation psychiatric conditions, USPS Disability, usps disability benefits, usps fers retirement, washington dc fers disability retirement, when the opm representative reviews your disability application, writing a successful personal narrative report, writing statement of disability as an art form | Leave a reply

FERS Disability Retirement: Use of Medical Reports

Posted on August 1, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

People often ask me whether or not a certain type of medical report should or should not be used.  As with almost all such questions, the answer is, “It Depends”.  On what?  On the content; in the manner it is written; and by whom.  This latter basis is often a determinative one.  For instance, should a medical report from a Chiropractor be used in an FERS Disability Retirement case?

Let me answer this question in a circuitous manner — I handled an MSPB case years ago where I had no “medical” doctors testify, but I had two chiropractors testify (I needed both of them, not because two makes better than one, but merely because they treated my client in sequence over the relevant period of time).  To the great consternation of the OPM representative, we won the case.

Thus, chiropractors can provide valid medical opinions, and the MSPB has accepted the testimony of chiropractors — as well as therapists — standing alone, without the primary support of a medical doctor.  However, my customary approach in the utilization of therapists and chiropractors, as well as physicians’ assistants, nurses, etc., is that they are most effective as secondary support to a primary medical narrative from a medical doctor.

This will often present an interesting conundrum in that, often, chiropractors and therapists will write the more detailed, substantive, and interesting report than the medical doctor.  That is okay.  To use such reports as a piggy-back upon the short, concise and straightforward medical report is often the best way to use such valuable resources.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) | Tagged arthritis fers disability retirement, attorney for US government employees, avoiding independent or occupational medicine doctors, chiropractor, disability retirement fers, disability retirement from the USPS, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, doctors report federal disability, doctors to testify in your federal disability case, documentation for medical retirement, federal civilian workers compensation office doctors help, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, federal employee medical retirement, federal employee turning over medical evidence to the opm, federal workplace injury, importance of the narrative report on opm disability, importance of you doctor's testimony during MSPB hearing, injured federal workers attorney, legal representation for injured federal workers, letter from doctor to claim federal disability retirement, medical compensation for federal and postal workers, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical documentation guidelines, medical evidence from other health care specialists, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement applic, neurologists narrative for FERS CSRS disability claim, opm csrs retirement, opm disability and physicians statements, opm disability law firm, OPM disability retirement for DEA employees, opm owcp, opm supportive medical documentation, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp medical retirement, physician testimony during the opm disability process, physicians' assistants and federal disability retirement, postal employee needs help with workers comp, postal service disability retirement, postal worker's injury, progressive debilitating condition of postal worker, qualified impairment for opm disability retirement, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, recurrence of owcp condition, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, support to a physician's medical narrative, types of medical reports used for fers disability, USPS Disability, usps limited duty jobs, usps lwop, usps work injury benefits, what documents should I turn over opm for my disability claim?, writing a narrative report for federal employee patients | Leave a reply

FERS Disability Retirement: Summer Doldrums & the Physician’s Statement

Posted on July 28, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

I have often pointed out in past blogs and articles that I do not have my clients sign the Physicians Statement (SF 3112C), for multiple and various reasons, not the least of which is that it is a confusing form, and in smaller print than necessary, leaving the impression to the doctor that what is requested is far more complex than what is actually required.  In its place, for my clients, I write a 4 – 5 page letter outlining the type of medical narrative report which I need.

This is the summer months; everyone from OPM representatives to lawyers, to doctors and Federal and Postal employees, take time off to recover from the hard work throughout the rest of the year.  When doctors take off for some “summer fun”, it just means that they have less time to spend on administrative matters — such as writing up a medical narrative report for their patients.

Because of this, it is important to try and simplify the matter as much as possible, and a blanket submission of the SF 3112C without some explanatory guidance, is not the best course of action.  Doctors need guidance, and in this busy world, it is best to streamline the process for them as much as possible.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill
Federal Disability Attorney

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, OPM Disability Application and/or Process | Tagged applicant's physician, atc disability retirement, avoiding a mistake in the opm disability medical narrative, civil service disability retirement, disability retirement fers, disability retirement from the USPS, disability retirement opm, doctors federal disability application form, faa disability retirement, federal civil service disability retirement, federal civilian workers compensation office doctors help, federal disability claim form on job injury, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement attorney for Arizona employees, federal employee benefits, federal employee medical retirement, federal employee retirement system doctors, federal employee's physician's statement of disability, federal government disability, federal worker injury compensation form 3112, federal workers comp recurrence, federal workplace injury, fers disability retirement law firm, FERS Disability Retirement Lawyer, helping your doctor for your disability claim, importance of the narrative report on opm disability, injured federal workers attorney, injured postal workers, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees disability retirement, legal representation for injured federal workers, long term disibility us postal service, long waiting during summer csrs disability, medical documentation guidelines, medical evaluation from primary treating physician, medical examinations for opm disability, medical narrative for federal disability claims, medical retirement from federal service, more weight to your treating physician opinion, obtaining cooperation from family doctor, opm and the summer, opm disability and physicians statements, opm disability application process during summer, opm disability forms, OPM Disability Retirement, opm federal disability retirement in Florida, opm medical documents, physician's statement of disability, Postal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal workers owcp rights attorney, questions for your doctor in federal disability cases, recurrence injury postal service, SF 3112C Physician's Statement, simplifying fers disability matters for your treating doctor, the injury postal employee, the role of the injured federal employee treating doctor, the symptoms and the diagnosis in the narrative report, treating doctors need legal guidance for opm disability claims forms, USPS disability retirement, when the us government challenge a workers injury claim, your doctor's opinion and the federal disability medical form | Leave a reply

CSRS & FERS Disability Retirement: The Law II

Posted on July 25, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

A more extensive article on the recent case of Reilly v. OPM has already appeared in FedSmith.com, because it is an important step forward in Federal Disability Retirement Law.  Decided July 15, 2009 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, it topples another idol of a false standard imposed by OPM:  that medical documentation which is written by a doctor after a Federal or Postal employee is separated from Federal Service may be dismissed as being near-irrelevant in evaluating and reviewing a Federal disability retirement application. This has never made sense, since many medical conditions are progressive and degenerative in nature, and that is precisely what the Court in Reilly argues.  “The field of forensic medicine abounds with examples of subsequent medical examinations relevant to a prior condition,” the Court in Reilly argued, citing the classic example that “inferencesabout prior intoxication can be drawn from blood alcohol tests conducted at a later time.”  Further, where “proximity in time, lay testimony, or some other evidence provides the requisite link to the relevant period the subsequent evidence can be very probative of a prior disability.” Of course medical evidence gathered within the 1-year period after separation of service should be given probative value.  The Court in Reilly states that principle clearly.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, Clarifications of Laws or Rules, Important Cases, Legal Updates and/or the Current Process Waiting Time | Tagged Administrative Law, atc disability retirement, california federal disability retirement, case law citation in federal disabilities cases, compensation for injury illness usdoj doj employees, CSRS disability attorney, disability retirement fers, disability retirement for injured Veterans Affairs employees, disability retirement from the USPS, doctor information to win a federal employee disability claim, document preparation and opm disability law, documentation for federal medical retirement, FAA Air Traffic Controllers, false standards in opm disability law, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability law blog, federal medical retirement, FERS Disability Retirement Attorney, FERS Disability Retirement Lawyer, guide to federal disability law, how to file a federal workers injury claim, importance of following up medical disability treatment, injured postal workers, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees disability retirement, interpretation of federal disability law, legal representation for injured federal workers, medical documentation guidelines, medical examinations for opm disability, misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability l, MSPB Disability Retirement, one year separated from service opm rule, one-year statutory timeframe, opm disability representative, OPM disability retirement, opm medical documentation after separation, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", Post Office disability, Postal disability retirement, postal workers owcp rights attorney, relevance of medical documentation after one year, separated from service, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, Sylvia M. Reilly v. OPM, the latest trends in opm disability retirement, the Reilly case and what it means for future federal applicants, the Reilly case in opm disability retirement, the statutes and regulations of administrative law, updates on opm disability medical records, us postal service disability program, USPS disability retirement, when the OPM creates its own laws, when the opm uses laws that don't exist in fdr, workers comp federal employee | Leave a reply

Tears

Posted on July 24, 2009 by Federal Disability Lawyer
Reply

“It is indeed a conundrum,” Master Tokuyazamo said in his soft, almost inaudible voice. His was as a whisper; one strained to hear the words, and in the very act of straining, the dichotomy between the word and the sound of the word was often split in half, as the two wings of a butterfly rise to become one, then to part with a fluidity of colors, and as when one’s imagination of what was said, what one thought was said, and what must have been said, often becomes a mystery. His pupils, gathered in a semi-circle, all cross-legged in meditative posture, leaning ever so slightly, wide-eyed and ranging from ages 6 to 15, with an eagerness that made him smile with youthful glee. For, who was the child, the Master or the pupil, the withered hands of an old man or the fumbling feet of a gangly boy? Was it the mind which determined the age, or the weathered hands, leathery and sunburned, of he who planted the rice fields carved in the sculptured steps of the Totoyama district? On a linear spectrum, his life was arriving at the entrance of the exit; he did not view the convergence of being, time and the soulful call of his yearning mind in such an unbending fashion. And, perhaps that was the paradigmatic problem when the Jesuit gai-jin had visited his sanctuary, the Monastery which had been his home, his garden, his peaceful center of solitude which he tended as a gardener cares for the exotic in that moment of bursting revelatory fragrances when the flower opens the fullness of its beauty, only to reach its pinnacle of being, and then to wilt, wither and die; but for that mysteriously delightful, brief moment, and that is how he viewed his monastic temple, where he swept the rock gardens with such care and precision, where each pebble was a droplet in an ocean of singularity, but at the hands of the Zen Master, pebble upon pebble became a work of art. Ah, but what incisiveness, and that sharp mind, and to have reached such heights of knowledge only to be a lowly sweeper of pebbles? Was the servant not the God of the gai-jin? Would it that he was happier as the carpenter’s son, than a sweeper of pebbles in a Zen garden?

But the Jesuit gai-jin had insisted upon doctrine; he pointed to his sacred Book, and translated for him the wise words of his master, who was God and Man all at once. He could not deny the truth, for the words fit beautifully; the logic of God was irrefutable; the parables were insightful and profoundly moving; but in the end, it was the insistence in his voice which marked the rudeness of his teaching. And, moreover, the cross was too rigid, and did not flow as life must. A river winds through the soil and finds the bend of the rocks, smooths the hardness of creation, and whittles away at the rough edges. So must the words of persuasion, and while he could sense the softness of the voice of that God of Palestine, the harsh tone of the gai-jin grated upon him, and the manner in which he grasped at the wooden cross hanging from his neck on a leather chain, his stubby fingers clasped and somehow unable to encircle the horizontal piece of wood which seemed to jut out discordantly in an abrasive, offending manner; it was unlike the waving bends of the ink of Sumi-e, where life flows as a stream of quietude, curving and dancing and adapting to nature’s winding pathways. Was it so personal? Was the dislike of the gai-jin the basis of his refutation? But that enlightenment would defy such pedantic reasons, but being human, oh so human, meant otherwise.

His pupils wanted answers.

“A story!” Saburo, the abandoned boy left at the stone steps leading to the temple gates at the age of 4, shouted with gleeful abandonment.

“Yes, a story!” joined in the chorus of other boys.

Roshi Tokuyazamo played his best to put on a look of censure and reproof; eyebrows furrowed, his right arm cocked stiffly against the flow of art, elbow up with palm against his thigh, he grunted with disapprobation. “Have you all … lost your sense of decorum?” he roared, narrowing his eyes with exaggerated fierceness, jaw jutting outward, his lips pursed. Nevertheless, his voice still was barely audible.

Silence befell the youthful sea of eager looks. Furtive glances askance; quiet, and deathly silence; then, from the depths of the youngest, a giggle, uncontrollable, squeaking upward until it could not be contained; and the single burst of air restrained, broke forth, and then another, and another, and soon the sea of youthful semi-circle roared into a singularity of unrestrained giggling, until some of the older boys who were still unsure of their position as young elders before the Master, as examples to behold in their position as students before the learned and wise one, smiled hesitantly, until the giggles turned to open laughter, the laughter into guffaws of boisterous untidiness in a temple of Zen. The Master cleared his throat, himself unable to contain the wrinkle of his lips. “Well, then,” he said. “Since decorum cannot be attained, perhaps a story must be told!”

Immediate silence befell the youthful pandemonium, as an axe falls, so laughter is shattered, and silence overwhelms. For to hear a story from Master Tokuyazamo was to learn a lifetime of lessons, one which went beyond decorum, beyond laughter, and beyond self.

The Master spoke: In the rocky pathways of the countryside, deep in the valleys of the Koishi Mountains, where the tributary of the Saitomo, Shinshiro and Kotaichi rivers converge, a stranger ventured unknowingly into the valley of the ronin, where bandits roamed the countryside. The stranger was attacked, robbed, stripped of his earthly possessions, then thrown down into a deep pit, the barren bowels of the earth, where he was left to die. For days he cried out, calling for help. It rained. He cupped his hands and, crippled and unable to stand, he whimpered like a dying mongrel, sipping upon the scarce handfuls of rainwater to extend the life that was no longer his to determine.

Master Tokuyazamo looked slowly around the semi-circle of young faces. Each of the faces revealed a stern serenity, a mask of serious concern; of them, he had a heart for Saburo, of that youth who, though never to be learned or wise, would have the heart of a man to feel the pain, and pain of others was often the pathway to enlightenment. This, few would understand.

He continued: From whence the Saitomo River flowed, a religious figure walked. The holy man of the Saitomo Province heard the mongrel’s whimpering, and at the mouth of the pit, he looked down and saw the dog of a man, half alive, famine-stricken with sunken eyes — and their eyes met. But it happened to be upon a day when God had set such a day apart, where human exertion was not allowed, the sacred laws of doctrine prevented the holy man from helping and…

“But, how could that be, Master!” came an interrupting shout from the semi-circle of youth. A loud chorus of “Shhh!” and “Shush!” and “Quiet!” and such reprimands quickly encircled the semi circle.

The holy man walked around and started away, saying to the dying figure below, “I will pray for you.”

Then, almost immediately upon the fading footsteps of the first holy man, from whence the Shinshiro River flowed, another religious figure walked. The holy man of the Shinshiro Province also heard the mongrel’s whimpering …

“But what about the first holy man – he cannot have been that holy to begin with!” blurted out a voice of youthful exuberance with an undisguised harrumph, only to be again shushed and reprimanded.

This holy man from Shinshiro Province viewed the world as merely the dream of a butterfly, and had achieved a state of cognitive and physical presence, or non-presence, as you might say, that only a Master of such Arts could achieve…

Silence. For, in the youthful semi-circle, even the exuberance of impatience inherent, wanting to burst forth, and helplessly unrestrained in the fertile minds of those lacking in years, could nevertheless recognize that this second holy man was a reflection of the temple pond. No chastisement was required, because the self-reflecting pool of thoughts and recognition, and the anticipation of hearing the story lead to a triumphant declaration of the feats and legendary discoveries and conquests at the hand and mind of the Master from Shinshiro Province, awaited with eager and hungry eyes. The Roshi surveyed the faces of inexperience and naivete, and smiled ever so slightly, as appearance paralleled the inaudible, and with wan acceptance, continued:

This second holy man was considered by many to be wise, though wisdom was always of a fleeting nature, as the soft film left behind when a man holds the wings of a butterfly in his hands. Ever the fragile being, the soft fluttering, yet when the predator snatches upon its wings and destroys a large portion, nevertheless the strength of the butterfly can tear itself away, partially destroyed and torn; yet, even then, the butterfly can continue to navigate skillfully for the remainder of its days with the aid of its antennas and adapt to its malformed and crippled essence; for neither the essence nor the being of the butterfly is defined by its wings, but rather the inner strength which propels its beauty, its dominance, and the dreams of those who fathom a world and universe apart from pain and pleasure. And, as the butterfly denotes the essence of this universe, so the Master from Shinshiro Province contained nothing more than the dream of the butterfly; for in the chasm where the suffering of such a man, gaunt with hunger, crying out with pleas for help, for pity, for…love. But if the nothingness is of no greater value than the mongrel, if pain is no more of reality than the one who feels the pain; if dreams converge in a world where that which appears is of no greater substance than that which is, then love cannot be of much consequence. The Master from Shinshiro Province looked down upon the blackness of the pit, and into the eyes of this pitiful, pitiable human mass of insignificance, and despite his wisdom, his age, his enlightened state of being, he could offer no help, because he could not feel the love of pain which the man below experienced. And so he turned his back and walked away…

“Good for him!” came a shout of triumph. The Roshi had his head bent downward, but his head tilted ever so slightly to spy upon the source of the statement. It was not Saburo, and for this he was glad. It was instead the fat boy, Kitaro, who sat with his arms crossed, fists beneath each opposing armpit, head tilted backward with an air of arrogance and triumph. “The man deserves to die for being so stupid! In any event, it will teach him to meditate and accept his fate with grace and dignity!”

Now, with silent footsteps came another holy man – from the flowing Kotaichi River, where is it said that the soft breath of the gods push the warm waters of the river, in such purity of rushing sounds that the animals from all of the surrounding provinces make their way up the extra mile to drink from its banks. Now, this holy man was somewhat peculiar; he wore a cross which hung from his neck –

Without looking, the Roshi could sense the faces of disdain sweep about the semi-circle – but for one.

He was what we call a Krish-chan, a gai-jin. Now, this holy man, upon hearing the whimpers of the dying man, immediately ran to cut some vines off of the trees, weaving the thickest of the wild vines into a triple-weave, and created a rudimentary but sturdy rope, fashioning a loop at the end, and lowered it down to help the man. After patiently prodding, directing, and with a gentle voice of encouragement, he was able to coax the weak and dying man to place the loop around and under each arm, and with that, the holy man pulled him ever so delicately up to the mouth of the pit. As he pulled, however, what he and the dying man were unaware of suddenly turned the circumstances of impending triumph into an unexpected tragedy. But of course, all of you boys know of this, do you not? For to think of life as mere pleasure and joy is to leave the other half undone; and to view the world of circumstances as a trifle of misery and hardships is the ignore the first half as unfinished; and so it is that life must always be a completed circle; and just as the wings of a butterfly do not constitute the essence of its being, so to expect life only as a vision of triumphs is to live only a half-life. In the deep crevice of the black pit was a nest of poisonous snakes, and as the half-man of a mongrel reached to steady his ascent to life, the fangs of fate struck, vipers of deadly venom, shooting death into the veins of the mongrel. He screamed. He jerked back in excruciating pain, pulling the rope-vine away from the grasp of the Krish-chan, and falling with a dull thud back into the blackness of the death-pit, whimpering as only a weakling could muster from the depths of a depraved and ravaged soul. The desperate, resigned and desolate sobbing of the poor, pitiful mongrel echoed from below, from the depths of darkness, with a despair of submission and surrender so profound, that the Krish-chan at first thought that it must, indeed, be another creature – a dog in pain, perhaps, downriver. He quickly realized, however, that the vine he held in his hands had burned and sliced his palms open, and he felt the sting of bleeding, and the momentary disparity and interlude between seeing the blood forming in clotting pools in his cupped hands, facing upwards toward the blazing sun, and the rush of pain which came thereafter to merge and coalesce into the knowledge that he had lost the one he was attempting to save. The sun was slowly fading into the unknown of the other world, that world between twilight and the ethereal red dusk of the mountain provinces. It is said that the tributary deep in the Koishi Mountains was where the goddess of beauty wept because, in a moment of anger, she looked down into the depths of the still waters and saw the darkness of her own heart, and realized that beauty is indeed but a fleeting figment; and in that instance the essence of beauty became shattered, man became revealed, and the knowledge that man was merely mortal became an undeniable truth. Ah, but that the pool of blood forming in the gai-jin’s hands could bring such clarity as the brightness of the red mountain dust in the dusk of the Koishi Mountains! Are we such saps that we believe that Zen is the only way to truth? Bah!

There was, indeed, curiosity in the faces of youth – even in the titled head of Kitaro. He stole a glance towards Saburo – were they eyes of tears? He could not tell. Whether of tears or merely of lost thoughts, or whether he merely wished that the boy would feel such pathos revealing wisdom in such tender years, he could not discern. He continued:

And so the gai-jin was lost.

Harrumph! came the huffiness from the direction of Kitaro. The Roshi pretended not to notice. In the blackness of the pit below, as the sun was setting and the gods of shadows appeared in a realm of mirroring Kabuki movements, where figures danced in the periphery of one’s imagination simultaneously as fear and foreboding clash in a war of the real, the dreaded, and the trickling sweat of fear, the gai-jin could smell the sweat of his body, mixed with the blood on his hands, and as he peered downward, he could barely make out the figure of the whimpering man. And, indeed, the man was crouched in a grotesque curl of fetal hugging, but whether on his back with his legs up, or on his knees tucked beneath, he could not tell, but the shadows of darkness playing tricks of skeletal outlines, blurring the boundaries between form and substance, as a cross might bear a crucified man but lost in the starkness of the wooden pillars. The sobbing heaves of the dying man bounced within the echo chamber of the rocky pit, and as the venom coursed through the veins of this mongrel, the Krish-chan looked down. Without a sound, he crouched close to the mouth of the pit, and slid down the deep throat of the seemingly bottomless chasm of darkness. He was lithe and skillful enough to land away from the crippled body, now rasping for life. He could smell the stench of impending death. He knelt beside the dying man, and cradled the limp body in his arms. “Holy man,” the dying mongrel rasped, “what are you doing? There is no rope, no way for you to return…”

I am here to comfort you, said the holy gai-jin.

What kind of a man are you? rasped the dying mongrel.

I am merely an ordinary man, who has an extraordinary Lord. As my Lord washed the feet of sinners, so I am here to give you comfort during your last moments of life in this world. For the comfort I may give to you this moment does not begin to compare with the suffering and sacrifice of my Lord, who died because of the abundance of His Love.

Silence. It is always the unspoken word which reveals the essence of being. For, it is words which create a conceptual, parallel universe, that which serves as the skin of the lizard; but for the elegance of a butterfly, whose silent folding wings leave but a residue of the warm breath of gods, Saburo was silently sobbing; but on the other side, to the triumph of the Roshi, it was Kitaro who had turned aside to wipe a single tear which had found the tributary of pores, as the rushing waters of the Kotaichi River grew louder and the soft flutter of a butterfly’s dream faded into the distant echoes of man’s soul, deep in thought, in prayer, and in silence.

Posted in Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, Parables and Stories, Reflections | Tagged an enlightened state of being, an ordinary man with an extraordinary Lord, Bible, decorum, gaijin, God and Man, God of Palestine, He who died for love, holy man of the Shinshiro Province, human emotions, Kabuki, Kitaro, Koishi Mountains, krish-chan, lifetime of lessons, logic of God, love, master of cognitive and physical presence, Master Tokuyazamo, meditation, open laughter, praying to God, Roshi, Saburo, tears, Temple of Zen, the carpenter’s son, the dream of the butterfly, the dying mongrel, the holy man of the Saitomo Province, the Jesuit gai-jin, the mask of serious concern, the poisonous snakes, the sacred laws of doctrine, the Saitomo Shinshiro and Kotaichi rivers, the semi-circle of youth, the third holy man, the three holy men, the unspoken word which reveals the essence of being, the valley of the ronin, the whimpers of a dying man, thinking of life as mere pleasure, Totoyama district, true love, unrestrained giggling, young elders, Zen garden, Zen master, Zen monastery | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Older posts

Search this OPM Medical Retirement website

Blogroll

  • Attorney Profile @ Avvo.com The attorney profile of Robert R. McGill, who specializes 100% of his time on Federal Retirement cases only. This page has more information about the law firm, client reviews and other important information.
  • Federal Disability Attorney More disability articles about FERS Disability Retirement benefits in the Federal Disability Attorney blog.
  • Federal Disability Retirement @ WordPress.com Daily information and updates about the Federal Retirement application, the Retirement process, new court cases, standard forms and many other tips and advice.
  • Federal Disability Retirement Home Page The home page of Attorney Robert R. McGill, with more medical administrative retirement articles, annuity calculators, statutory and evolving case laws, contact information and much more.

Archives

Categories

  • 1st Stage: The Initial Federal Retirement Claim
  • 2nd Stage: OPM Reconsideration Stage
  • 3rd Stage: MSPB Stage
  • 4th Stage: Petition for Full Review at the MSPB
  • Accommodation and Light Duty
  • Accommodation and Reassignment
  • Advantages of Federal Medical Retirement
  • Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions
  • Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM
  • Basic Federal Disability Concepts
  • Burden of Proof
  • Clarifications of Laws or Rules
  • Evaluation Of Your Federal Medical Claim – How Do I Know If I Have A Strong Case?
  • FAQs and Potential Issues
  • Federal Disability and a Hostile Working Environment
  • Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted
  • Federal Employees with Disabilities
  • FERS Accepted Medical Conditions
  • FERS Disability
  • FERS Disability Forms
  • Important Cases, Legal Updates and/or the Current Process Waiting Time
  • Important Rules and Considerations
  • Life after Federal Retirement
  • LWOP and Sick Leave in OPM Disability
  • Medical Documentation
  • Mental/Nervous Condition
  • Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)
  • Miscellaneous
  • OPM Case Workers
  • OPM Disability & EEOC Complaints
  • OPM Disability & OWCP Workers Comp Filings
  • OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits
  • OPM Disability Application and/or Process
  • OPM Disability Retirement Application
  • OPM Medical Questionnaire
  • OWCP Disability Benefits
  • Parables and Stories
  • Post Application Issues
  • Postal Service
  • Preexisting Conditions
  • Professional & Expert Witnesses
  • Reasonable Medical Treatment and Compliance Issues
  • Reflections
  • Resigning or Being Separated From a Federal Agency for Medical Problems
  • SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package
  • SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS
  • SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS
  • SF 3112C Physician's Statement for CSRS and FERS
  • SF 3112D Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for CSRS and FERS
  • Some Preliminary Considerations
  • Strategies
  • The Agency
  • The Applicant
  • The Attorney
  • The Doctor
  • The Doctor
  • The Federal Agencies
  • The Federal Disability Lawyer
  • The Federal Disability Retirement Process
  • The Federal or Postal Supervisor
  • The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney
  • The MSPB Administrative Judge
  • The Office of Personnel Management
  • The OPM Representatives
  • The Others
  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)
  • U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
  • U.S. Postal Service (USPS) & Medical Retirement
  • When The OPM Application Is Approved
  • When The OPM Application Is Denied

MAIN CONTENT

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Credentials
  • Copyright
  • Contact Us

Articles

  • 10 Common Mistakes Made in a Federal Disability Application
  • 20 Top Questions and Answers about OPM Disability Retirement
  • FERS Disability Retirement Calculator
  • Some Thoughts on Social Security and FERS Disability Retirement
The Federal Disability Attorney Network
Proudly powered by WordPress